then again you also get the whole “gold star gay” thing so it’s not like stupid homophobic things don’t come from within the LGBT community sometimes
no i really do think you understand it. it’s renarkably terrible.
I want to hear what others think.
I mean they seem to be confusing emotional, sexual-emotional, and sexual attraction as well as ruling that because heterosexuality is the standardised, imposed norm, any women who isn’t sexually attracted to men but isn’t ostensibly interested in women is brainwashed and is terrified of the truth that they are a lesbian, which is pretty fuckin problematic in itself
like they are literally saying that because of compulsive heterosexuality (another term that’s a can of worms) women do not actually find men attractive sexually or no, because they are totally brainwashed.
I try and be open-minded and have at least a small modicum of critical thinking at the ready but
can someone please explain political lesbianism? No matter how much I read, it still ends up asserting that sexuality is a choice. They assert that “sexuality is not a choice” implies that cishet is automatically the base comparison point and the “right” way. Anyone care to shed light because I’m getting MAJOR homophobe vibes from these people
DIY pinhole cameras are a dime a dozen, but rarely are they as well thought out and elegant as the VIDDY currently being funded on Kickstarter.
The VIDDY comes in 35mm and medium format editions, along with a handy app to help you with exposure times.
I’ve seen some interesting points and articles about political lesbianism and they make for nice reading but they constantly try not to mention the whole believing sexuality is a choice thing
"Insanity is doing the exact same fucking thing over and over again expecting shit to change. That. Is. Crazy.”
"so it’s a cool game with ____ mechanics"
"it involves procedural gener-"
"How to be Homophobic 101" by Political Lesbians
The trouble with photography in general is that everything is interesting.